Barriers to Meeting Community Needs in New York State during COVID-19: Results From a Pilot Survey of Nongovernmental Population and Community Health Professionals.

Capacity building and training help empower the community and population health organizations to partner with local health departments and collaboratively design multisectoral interventions that account for the complexity of public health and health promotion challenges in the era of COVID-19 and beyond. Ideally, training programs should be informed by an understanding of the needs and priorities of the professionals for whom they are intended. This brief report focuses on the results of a pilot online survey conducted as part of a larger pilot study by the New York State Association of County Health Officials and the Region 2 Public Health Training Center among population and community health professionals (n = 27) from four counties in New York State during the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey participants included a diverse group of staff members from various large and small nonprofit organizations, federally qualified health centers, academic institutions, hospitals, and insurers. Survey findings provide preliminary insights into the extent to which these organizations have been involved in the COVID-19 response in partnership with LHDs, barriers they faced in responding to the needs of the populations they serve and adjusting their work routines/operations to COVID-19 guidelines, and their top emerging organizational and training needs. Lessons learned from conducting an online survey during a public health emergency and implications for future training interventions for population and community health professionals are also discussed within the context of promoting multisectoral collaboration with local health departments, solving complex public health problems, and advancing health equity.

COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Phase 2 of an in Progress Review in New York State Local Health Departments.

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York State (NYS), local health departments (LHDs) have worked to mitigate the highly infectious disease. As lead public health experts in their communities, LHDs are responsible for providing communicable disease control, emergency response, and establishing immunization programs, including leading large-scale vaccine distribution efforts. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the processes used by LHDs in NYS to administer COVID-19 vaccines, as well as identify successes and challenges, and highlight lessons learned to improve future mass vaccination campaigns. Data were collected in two phases: (1) extant data collection of public communications; and (2) discussion groups with public health leaders across the state. Notable themes from both phases include: partnerships, programmatic elements, communication, role of LHD, State-LHD coordination, and human and physical resources. Analysis of both public and internal communications from LHDs across NYS revealed several core challenges LHDs faced during COVID-19 vaccine rollout and identified innovative solutions that LHDs used to facilitate vaccine access, administration, and uptake in their communities. Findings from this multi-phase qualitative analysis support the need to bolster the capacity and training of the local public health workforce to ensure preparedness for future public health emergencies.

Advancing Leadership Training to Address Health Equity and Respond to Public Health Emergencies.

CONTEXT: In 2015, Impactivo developed the Advancing Leadership in Times of Crisis (ALTC) program for the Region 2 Public Health Training Center under a subaward from the Health Resources and Services Administration. Puerto Rico's (PR) government had defaulted on its debt, and public health officials needed tools to face the fiscal crisis. The ALTC has since been adapted for PR's public health emergencies, including the Zika epidemic, category 5 hurricanes, earthquakes, and the Covid-19 pandemic. PROGRAM: The program incorporates Ron Heifetz's work on Adaptive Leadership and Marshall Ganz's work on community organizing to address the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Essential Public Health Services (EPHS) and health equity. The ALTC is a contextualized and modularized training program that has been provided in different modalities in person and online. IMPLEMENTATION: The Spanish language program has been carried out with 4 cohorts (totaling 82 graduates). Participants were 80% women and 100% Hispanic, empowering underrepresented groups to achieve change. EVALUATION: In the immediate postprogram survey, more than 90% strongly agree that their understanding of the subject matter improved, that they were able to identify actions that apply to their work, and that they were confident in their ability to apply it. Follow-up surveys after the COVID-19 pandemic found that 89% of respondents continue to work in public health, 25% were promoted, and 49% felt confident to train others. Participants also reported that ALTC helped them increase their public health tools (91%), expand their network (84%), and strengthen knowledge about the EPHS (90%). DISCUSSION: Evidence supports that ALTC is a promising training program to increase leadership skills and EPHS competencies that can be adapted to address contextual health equity and public health emergencies. Future research should explore the expansion of ALTC to other contexts and its impact on population health and health equity.

New York State Local Health Department Preparedness for and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An In-Progress Review.

A mixed-methods approach was taken to describe lessons learned by local health department leaders during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York State and to document leaders' assessments of their departments' emergency preparedness capabilities and capacities. Leaders participating in a survey rated the effectiveness of their department's capabilities and capacities in administrative and public health preparedness, epidemiology, and communications on a scale from 1 to 5; those partaking in focus groups answered open-ended questions about the same 4 topics. Subjects rated intragovernmental activities most effective ( = 4.41, SD = 0.83) and reported receiving assistance from other county agencies. They rated level of supplies least effective ( = 3.03, SD = 1.01), describing low supply levels and inequitable distribution of testing materials and personal protective equipment among regions. Local health departments in New York require more state and federal aid to maintain the public health workforce in preparation for future emergencies.